Bunning (Almost) Fights Unemployment
March 4, 2010 Leave a comment
I have a friend who got fed up with his job, and gave it up because he felt collecting unemployment was a better option. This, alone, is evidence of how unemployment benefits increase unemployment…but it gets worse:
He eventually got tired of not working at all, and got a job one day a week, just low enough not to cut into his unemployment benefit.
Here comes the “worse” part.
His employer liked him, and kept begging him to work full time…but he planned to kick back and relax until unemployment ran out. That’s right, benefits not only caused him to CHOOSE to be unemployed, but to refuse to take a full-time job, keeping him on the unemployment roles. But at least it would eventually run out…right?
- Then Bush and Congress decided to extend it.
- Then, when it was about to run out (again), Obama and Congress extended it once more. My friend has ended up living off the taxpayers, indefinitely, while his employer dreams of GIVING him full time work.
- Then Jim Bunning decided my friend must go back to work. His employer must have been thrilled.
Not that Bunning is a principled Conservative, who believes in not subsidizing unemployment. No, he is just a partisan RiNO grandstanding against unfunded government spending…now that Bush isn’t the one spearheading it.
Which may be why he caved in, just a short time later. My friend gets to remain a burden on society, unemployment gets to remain artificially high.
Ever wonder how much of the 10% unemployment is simply people who CHOOSE not to work, because the government subsidizes not working?
What we need is more people in Congress who are actually like Jim Bunning was pretending, for a few hours, to be.